Open Journal Systems

Cover Image

THE SACRAL HIATUS: AN ANATOMIC STUDY ON BOTH CADAVERIC AND DRY BONES

Ashraf Y Nasr, Youssef H Ali, Naser A ElSawy

Abstract


The sacral hiatus is the gap on the lower part of dorsal surface of sacrum.  It is formed due to the failure of fusion of the laminae of the 5th sacral segment.  The sacral hiatus provides the main route of the caudal epidural nerve block.  The success rate of the caudal nerve block showed an important correlation to the variations of the sacral hiatus dimensions.  150 dry Egyptian sacra and five cadavers were used in the present study.  Different anatomical measurements were made with a Vernier caliper accurate to 0.1 mm to know the anatomical variations of the sacral hiatus.  Complete agenesis of the sacral hiatus was seen in four (2.66%) sacra.  The mean length of sacral hiatus was 27.16 mm and it showed a wide range (7-110 mm).  The mean transverse diameter (width) of sacral hiatus was 11.5 mm.  The mean anteroposterior diameter of the sacral canal at the apex of sacral hiatus was 4.78 mm.  Narrowing of the sacral canal at the apex of sacral hiatus, diameter less than 3 mm was seen in 10 (6.66%) sacra.   The apex of sacral hiatus was commonly found at the level of the 4th sacral vertebra in 54%.  Various shapes of sacral hiatus were observed which included inverted V (38.66%), inverted U (31.33%), irregular (15.33%), dumbbell (12%) and bifid (2.66%). The base of sacral hiatus was seen at the level of S5 vertebra in 70%.  The fusion between coccyx and sacrum was observed in 18% of sacra while the sacralisation of the 5th lumber vertebra was noticed in 14 (9.33%) sacra.  The knowledge of the anatomical variations of sacral hiatus is important during administration of the caudal epidural anaesthesia.  Moreover, it may help in improving the success rate of the caudal anaesthesia.

 


Keywords


Sacral hiatus, caudal anaesthesia

Full Text:

PDF PDF Plus

References


Esses SE and Botsford DJ:: Surgical anatomy and operative approaches to the sacrum. In Frymoyer, J. W.; Ducker, T. B.; Hadler, M. M.; et al. Eds: The adult spine: Principles and practice, ed. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, Volume 2: Pp. 2329-2341, 1997.

Tomoki N, Kazuo H and Youji O: The Median Approach to Transsacral Epidural Block. Anesth. Analg 2002; 95: 1067- 1070.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200210000-00051

Standring S: Gray's Anatomy 39 ed. Pp. 749-754. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, New York, Philadelphia, Sydney, Toronto, 2005.

Joseph S, Chen and John K Song: Anatomy of the sacrum. Neurosurgery Focus 2003; 15 Aug. (2): 1-4.

Waldman SD: Caudal epidural nerve block prone position. In: Atlas of interventional pain management, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. Pp. 380-392, 2004.

Senoglu, N, Senoglu M, Oksuz H, Gumusalan Y, Yuksel KZ, Zencirci B, Ezberci M and Kizilkanat E: Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study. Br. J. Anaesthesia 2005; sep. (9): Pp. 1-4.

Harlod E: The sacral and caudal block. Anaesthesia and intensive care medicine 2006; volume 7, issue 11: 397-398.

Bela V and David C: Caudal epidural Anaesthesia. Update in Anaesthesia 1998; 8 (3): 1-12.

Dalen B and Hasnaoui A: Caudal Anesthesia in Pediatric Surgery: success rates and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients. Anesth. Analg 1989.; 68: 83-89.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/00000539-198902000-00002

Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K and Kikuchi S: An anatomical study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin. J. Pain; Jan.-Feb 2004; 20 (1): 51- 54.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200401000-00010

PMid:14668657

Jones, B. Shelia; Dennis, W. W. Shaw and Lawrence E. Jacobson: A Transsacral Approach through the Sacral Hiatus for Myelography, 1997.

Kumer V, Pandy SN, Bajpai RN, Jain PN and Lonjia GS: Morphometrical study of sacral hiatus. J. Anat. Soc. India Jun 1992; 41 (1): 7-13.

Nagar SK: A Study of Sacral Hiatus in Dry Human Sacra. J. Anat. Soc. India 2004; 53 (2): 18- 21.

Crighton IM, Barry BP and Hobbs GJ: A study of the anatomy of the caudal space using magnetic resonance imaging. Br. J. Anaesthesia 1997; 78: 391-395.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/78.4.391

Jang, H. Roh; Dong, J. Change; Jae, H. Lee; Kyung B. Yoon; Won, O. Kim and Duck, M. Yoon: Caudal block ultrasound guidance. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 374-378.

Trotter M and Lanier PF: Hiatus canalis sacralis in American whites and Negros. Human Biology 1945; 17: 368-381.

PMid:21015697

Trotter M and Letterman GS: Variations of the female sacrum; their significance in continuous caudal analgesia. Surg. Gynaecol. Obestet 1944; 78 (4): 419- 424.

Lanier VS, Mcknight HE, Trotter M: Caudal analgesia: An experimental and anatomical study. Am. J. Ob. & Gyna 1944; 5: 633-641.

Park JH, Koo BN; Kim JY, Sho JE, Kim WO and Kil HK: determination of the optimal angle for needle insertion during caudal block in children using ultrasound imaging. Anaesthesia 2006; 61 (10): 946-949.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04795.x

PMid:16978308

Trotter M: Variations of the sacral canal; their significance in the administration of caudal analgesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1947; 26 (5): 192-202.

Shinohara H: The size and position of the sacral hiatus in man. J. Okajimas Folia Anat. Japan 1999; 76; (2-3): 89-93

http://dx.doi.org/10.2535/ofaj1936.76.2-3_89




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14259%2Ftcb.v2i1.124

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.